<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blog.Fed-Tax.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fed-tax.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:44:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='blog.fed-tax.net' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://blog.fed-tax.net/osd.xml" title="blog.Fed-Tax.net" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://blog.fed-tax.net/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>New Idaho Senate Legislation to join Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/03/10/idaho-introduces-legislation-to-join-streamlined-sales-tax-agreement/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/03/10/idaho-introduces-legislation-to-join-streamlined-sales-tax-agreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed-Tax.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idaho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Street Fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined sales tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Idaho Senator Mike Jorgensen (R-Hayden Lake) proposed Idaho Senate Bill 1295 to have Idaho join the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement!<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=248&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/03/10/idaho-introduces-legislation-to-join-streamlined-sales-tax-agreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>HI there!</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/03/07/hi-there/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/03/07/hi-there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 13:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed-Tax.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Street Fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined sales tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SB 2405 adopts changes to the Hawaii General Excise Tax system to allow Hawaii to participate in the national Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement. Hopefully Gov. Lingle will allow SB 2405 to become law this year, now that Hawaii is expected to be $500,000,000+ over budget.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=364&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/03/07/hi-there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida Senate Introduces Streamlined Bill</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/03/02/fl_sm_254/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/03/02/fl_sm_254/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Street Fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSUTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined sales tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the Legislature of the State of Florida:
(1) Calls upon the members of the Florida Congressional delegation to join as co-sponsors of the Main Street Fairness Act and support its swift adoption by the Congress of the United States.
(2) Urges President Barak Obama to sign the Main Street Fairness Act into law upon its passage by Congress.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=355&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/03/02/fl_sm_254/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado&#8217;s new law</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/03/02/colorados-new-law/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/03/02/colorados-new-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TaxCloud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Complete details are <A href="http://taxcloud.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/colorado-hb-1193-law.pdf" target="_blank">in the bill which became law</A> on February 24 (less than one week before it became effective).<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=350&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/03/02/colorados-new-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Response: NPR All Tech Considered</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/26/response-npr-all-tech-considered/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/26/response-npr-all-tech-considered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon affiliates tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Street Fairness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is bad civic, economic, and legislative policy to keep a system in place which induces ordinary consumers into unknowingly committing tax fraud.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=347&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/26/response-npr-all-tech-considered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Response: Newsleader.com Editorial regarding Viginia SB 660</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/22/response-newsleader-com-editorial-regarding-viginia-sb-660/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/22/response-newsleader-com-editorial-regarding-viginia-sb-660/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon affiliates tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps most frustrating for Virginians is that SB 660 seems to be passing while <b>less than 1 week earlier</b> a better and more appropriate legislation, Virginia Senate Bill 340, was delayed for consideration until 2011.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=341&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/22/response-newsleader-com-editorial-regarding-viginia-sb-660/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Response: LA Times invents more Amazon Tax.</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/22/resplat/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/22/resplat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon affiliates tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Budget and Policy Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complex Nexus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed-Tax.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSUTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined sales tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The LA Times fact-checker seems to have been asleep-at-the-wheel when the article fabricated that the legislation could result in $150 million in revenue, but the CA Senate only projected $107 million.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=324&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/22/resplat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>California takes another crack at Amazon Tax</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/19/ca_amzn_take2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/19/ca_amzn_take2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon affiliates tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[February 18, 2010 - In Assembly Bill No. 8 of the 8th extraordinary session, the California legislature has expanded the definition of a "Retailer engaged in business in this state" to include Internet Affiliate marketers.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=298&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/19/ca_amzn_take2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jewlers of America calls for Sales Tax Fairness Legislation</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/19/ja_ms/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/19/ja_ms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewelers of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Street Fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined sales tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jewelers of America leadership and members are tired of <a href="http://www.bluenile.com/">Blue Nile</a> not charging sales tax.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=302&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/19/ja_ms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>All aboard!?</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/18/all-aboard/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/18/all-aboard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon affiliates tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed-Tax.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Street Fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TaxCloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a lot of activity in individual States over the last few weeks after the State of New York reported generating $53 million in new sales and use tax revenue from the <strong>30 companies</strong> ensnared by their Complex Nexus legislation.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=212&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/18/all-aboard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>OK&#8230; I Can&#8217;t figure this one out&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/17/ok-271/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/17/ok-271/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined sales tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HB 2716 establishes the <b>Unconstitutional Interstate Taxation Prevention Unit</b> with the Attorney General to prevent any state other than the State of Oklahoma from enforcing or attempting to enforce sales and use tax laws.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=316&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/17/ok-271/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>TaxAnalysts.com Publishes thoughtful article on Streamlined vs. Amazon Tax</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/15/taxanalysts_compariso/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/15/taxanalysts_compariso/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon affiliates tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed-Tax.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Street Fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TaxAnalysts.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vendor Presumption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The greatest cause for concern is that this developing state-by-state patchwork of varied interpretations of affiliate nexus may mislead Federal legislators into believing that such efforts present a more viable option than the SSUTA for states to recover lost ecommerce-related revenue.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=284&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/15/taxanalysts_compariso/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado Senate revises HB 1193 to focus on Use Tax Reporting</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/09/colorado-senate-revises-hb-1193-to-focus-on-use-tax-reporting/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/09/colorado-senate-revises-hb-1193-to-focus-on-use-tax-reporting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon affiliates tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complex Nexus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Street Fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation without representation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now instead of businesses cancelling their affiliate programs in Colorado, businesses may just suspend all sales efforts in Colorado.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=275&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/09/colorado-senate-revises-hb-1193-to-focus-on-use-tax-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>I can get MO&#8230; Satisfaction!</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/09/mossuta/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/09/mossuta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Sales Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Street Fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined sales tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday in the great State of Missouri, Senator Joan Bray introduced legislation calling for Missouri to become a Full Member of the <a href="http://www.streamlinedsalestax.org" target="_blank">Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement</a>.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=271&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/09/mossuta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEBATE: &#8220;Amazon&#8221; Affiate Taxes vs. Streamlined Sales Tax</title>
		<link>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/06/debate-amazon-affiate-taxes-vs-streamlined-sales-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/06/debate-amazon-affiate-taxes-vs-streamlined-sales-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed-Tax.net</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon affiliates tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Budget and Policy Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fed-Tax.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Street Fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined sales tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TaxCloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Federal Tax Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TaxAnalysts (http://www.taxanalysts.com) hosted a fascinating panel discussion at the National Press Club this morning that everyone interested in Internet sales taxes should invest the two hours of time to listen to the entire debate.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=blog.fed-tax.net&blog=7618692&post=264&subd=taxcloud&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.fed-tax.net/2010/02/06/debate-amazon-affiate-taxes-vs-streamlined-sales-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/25f5ec09017e348ecde4f6146a4ccd62?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Fed-Tax.net</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>