http://blog.fed-tax.net/2009/07/20/complexnexus/ Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:51:18 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 http://blog.fed-tax.net/2009/07/20/complexnexus/#comment-90 Response: Denver Post warns Amazon buyers « blog.Fed-Tax.net Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:37:25 +0000 http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=73#comment-90 [...] Comments Response: Denver Pos… on All aboard!?All aboard!? «… on Sorting out “Sales Affil…Response: Another LA… on Sorting out “Sales Affil…Response to Forbes … on [...] [...] Comments Response: Denver Pos… on All aboard!?All aboard!? «… on Sorting out “Sales Affil…Response: Another LA… on Sorting out “Sales Affil…Response to Forbes … on [...]

]]> http://blog.fed-tax.net/2009/07/20/complexnexus/#comment-88 All aboard!? « blog.Fed-Tax.net Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:33:55 +0000 http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=73#comment-88 [...] Complex Nexus legislation (often referred to as the “Amazon” Tax – as we have written about before). While Rhode Island and North Carolina passed similar legislation last year, they have not [...] [...] Complex Nexus legislation (often referred to as the “Amazon” Tax – as we have written about before). While Rhode Island and North Carolina passed similar legislation last year, they have not [...]

]]> http://blog.fed-tax.net/2009/07/20/complexnexus/#comment-71 Response: Another LA Times Article « blog.Fed-Tax.net Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:01:30 +0000 http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=73#comment-71 [...] scheme is appropriate for California.  As we have said repeatedly in previous posts (particularly this one), targeting affiliate marketing oriented businesses will only affect a handful of Internet [...] [...] scheme is appropriate for California.  As we have said repeatedly in previous posts (particularly this one), targeting affiliate marketing oriented businesses will only affect a handful of Internet [...]

]]> http://blog.fed-tax.net/2009/07/20/complexnexus/#comment-70 Response to Forbes “A Flat Sales Tax?” « blog.Fed-Tax.net Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:10:38 +0000 http://blog.fed-tax.net/?p=73#comment-70 [...] The article continues by describing how the State of New York has gotten restless in awaiting legislation necessary for the Streamlined effort to become adopted as federal law (The Main Street Fairness Act, soon to be introduced before congress). Last year New York enacted a law which redefines the concept of substantial nexus (i.e. “place of business”) to single-out Internet-based affiliate network businesses. Forbes readers should have significant concerns about this state legislation, because it could be interpreted to include any direct response mechanism (or for that matter, any contractual relationship) as it blurs the historical “bright-line” test of physical presence to determine substantial nexus, which is why we call it Complex Nexus. We have written about this in much more detail on our Blog. [...] [...] The article continues by describing how the State of New York has gotten restless in awaiting legislation necessary for the Streamlined effort to become adopted as federal law (The Main Street Fairness Act, soon to be introduced before congress). Last year New York enacted a law which redefines the concept of substantial nexus (i.e. “place of business”) to single-out Internet-based affiliate network businesses. Forbes readers should have significant concerns about this state legislation, because it could be interpreted to include any direct response mechanism (or for that matter, any contractual relationship) as it blurs the historical “bright-line” test of physical presence to determine substantial nexus, which is why we call it Complex Nexus. We have written about this in much more detail on our Blog. [...]

]]>